Saturday, 1 June 2013

Some thoughts on the EDL

In light of the recent murder of a young soldier on our streets the group with 3 letters has once again raised it head in protest and has, as per usual, been attacked from all sides for doing it.

The hierarchy of the this group are the racist morons portrayed but the manner of the attacks on them by people who feel they are a lot better than those with concerns about those who seek to butcher individuals on our streets, in the name of their religion, raises some questions including:

Why is it that the 'good folk' who protest against cuts are not outraged about cuts to anti-terror funds in what is being described as a 'low risk borough'?

Why is it that social media can be monitored and used as a tool that leads to the arrest of people protesting yet the authorities can not arrest those spouting the same type of venomous hatred, in front of their eyes, outside a mosque or on our streets towards our service men and women when returning to our country?

Why is selected history used to ridicule the groups with three letters when history shows that even people like Emily Davidson resorted to using violence (and I am not condoning it) because her voice wasn't being heard, in the same way the supporters of the groups with 3 letters believe their voices are not being heard?

Why isn't 'know to us' not 'dealt with by us' in terms of  Why is it that a country like Kenya can deport it's criminals (as they see them) yet the UK can't?

and

If education is the answer to terrorists why do those calling for it feel it acceptable to exchange bottle tosses with 'morons'?

The groups with three letters are mostly thugs who, if they didn't have the outlet of these protest, would probably be at football stadiums etc. attempting to cause trouble and their knowledge of history and their use of the 2nd World War, in particular, is to be frank revolting but another question that needs answering is where do people with concerns, even hatred towards some members of a religion go to get their voices heard.

When some are saying it's racism to attack a religion not a race are the sheep grazing on the utopia of multiculturalism doing themselves justice, especially when even the 'great leaders' are acknowledging its problems or is their automatic contempt blinding them and as much to blame for the likes of the group with three letters feeling the need to exist as the terrorist, who goes around hacking soldiers to bits, feels the need to commit murder?