Monday, 20 January 2014
Some thoughts on Rennard
The guy has been investigated and no action against him has been taken.
Some weak investigator, who couldn't find reason for action to be taken against him, has then decided to cover their own back with some petty pathetic stance that even though he couldn't find good reason to take action or to put it more simply do what he was paid to investigate, that Rennard should apologise.
While the entire things smells badly for Rennard to apologise would mean he had to admit the guilt that this well paid expert couldn't find.
The political elite should ask themselves would they admit to a guilt that a prosecutor could not find sufficient evidence of.
It easy to say yes and make the moral noises in the safe position of generating media awareness etc. but if it is the case that apologies should be made I'll look forward to the many the should now be spouted from the likes of Yvette Cooper and others while they were in office.
Thursday, 9 January 2014
Progress Bursary Application: How does Labour win a majority in 2015?
How does Labour win a majority in 2015?
I would like to
apply for a bursary for the political weekend and despite being male and, as
such, falling into the automatic default for deliberate inequality and
victimisation by the party, feel that my being a poorly educated, living with
dyslexia, Northerner, who is unfortunately living on benefits because of
medical retirement should enable me to meet most, if not all, tick box
evaluations.
As a grateful
recipient of bursaries in the past I could also simply re write previous
‘winners’ and claim the prize with little regard to what it takes to win.
The party itself,
in its hope to win a majority in 2015, should do very much the same, we did
after all lose the last election by not listening to what ‘we’ were frequently
being told, branding even supporters bigots on occasion because ‘we’ know far
better about the communities ‘we’ claim ‘we’ want to represent than the people
who actually live in them, and that great success served us so well.
‘We’ should continue
with our university textbook view of life, especially that formed in the
Westminster bubble, appoint candidates not because they have ability to
represent, have knowledge of constituencies or basic essentials, that would
make the great unwashed think now that’s a person who is worth going to the
polling station to vote for but because they fill a quota and rely on a complete
and utter contempt for Call Me Dave, while being firm in our belief that we
will win in 2015, not because ‘we’ are worthy of being elected, that ‘we’ have
sound policy that won’t just make the Nation better but will also heel the
damage caused by the previous incumbents, nor the values to show that not only
does politics matter it works but with strength in the assumption that by default
‘we’ will win because it is our turn.
Such foolhardy
contempt did, after all, bring little consequence to the party machine, the
last time it failed, those who lost their seats didn’t exactly lose out, some
are even in better paid jobs, the only people who truly suffered are those who
let Dave and Co in and if they are still stupid enough to not see the light why
should we care, it’s not like our bubble is going to pop is it…..
For anyone reading
to the end however some 2015 suggestions that could help win are:
Make our politics ‘attractive’
to all not just the shouty minorities we feel we must appease to succeed.
Make the party
worthy of being elected, not just in a position to be elected.
Stop pandering to
the latest headline.
Truly understand
what the action of our politics equates to.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
